Skip to content
FishingHQSearch

How to identify ling

Molva molva · Lotidae

The characters that identify ling, ranked by how far each one can be trusted on its own.

Safety

Species that biteCan cause injury needing treatment

Sharp backward-pointing teeth in a large mouth, on a strong fish handled on a moving deck.

What reduces it: Never put a hand in the mouth. Control the fish before unhooking, use long pliers or a de-hooking tool, and wear gloves.

Barotrauma and pressure injuryCan cause serious injury or death

Fish brought up from wreck depths suffer catastrophic swim bladder expansion and cannot return, so release is largely ineffective.

What reduces it: Decide what will be kept before fishing. Do not fish for numbers on a mark whose population is finite and slow to replace. Where release matters, this is not the fishery for it.

A ling laid on wet rock in full side view, showing a long body with a short first dorsal fin, a very long second dorsal and anal fin, a rounded dark-edged tail and a barbel on the chin.
Ling (Molva molva), a landed fish on the rocks.Identified by: Whole fish in lateral view on wet rock. The very long second dorsal and anal fins, the rounded dark-margined tail, the chin barbel and the marbled gold flank are all legible.Vsevolod — CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commonssource, licence

Look at this first

The shape settles it before any detail does. A ling is long and almost eel-like, quite unlike the deep-bodied northern gadoids, and it carries a second dorsal fin that runs most of the way to the tail. Nothing else in northern waters looks like it.

Diagnostic — settles it on its own

Each of these settles the identification on its own. If one is clear, you have your answer.

  • A very long second dorsal fin

    Two dorsal fins, the first short and the second running back along most of the body towards the tail, mirrored below by a similarly long anal fin. Cod, haddock, pollack and saithe all have three dorsals and two anals, so the count alone separates ling from every one of them.

  • Pelvic fins present, and separate fins throughout

    The character that separates ling from conger eel, which is the other long dark fish taken on the same wrecks. A conger has no pelvic fins and its dorsal, tail and anal fins are continuous; a ling has pelvics under the throat and distinct separate fins.

Supporting — use with other characters

Real characters that are not conclusive by themselves. Use two or three together.

  • A single prominent chin barbel

    One clear whisker under the jaw, as in cod. Combined with the elongate body it is conclusive, and it is another point of separation from conger, which has none.

  • A dark spot at the rear of each dorsal fin

    Both the first and the second dorsal carry a dark mark at the trailing edge. Consistent enough to be worth checking and not something to rely on alone.

Suggestive only — varies with condition

Hints only. These vary with condition, season, water and how long the fish has been out of it, and a fish that contradicts them is still the same species.

  • Marbled brown and bronze above

    Attractive and variable. Ling from deep water are paler, and the marbling fades in a dead fish.

What it gets confused with

  • Conger eel, which is the serious confusion on a wreck. Pelvic fins and separate fins settle it.
  • Burbot, in fresh water — the only freshwater member of the family, and not found in the same places.
  • Small ling and large whiting, briefly, until the fin count is checked.

Side by side: Ling vs Burbot.

Where this stops working

The identification is easy in an adult and less so in a small fish, where the body is proportionally deeper and the second dorsal less obviously elongate. Nothing here depends on colour. A ling that has been gaffed or badly handled can lose the dorsal spots, which is why the fin arrangement leads.

The full record

This page covers identification only. The Ling record covers behaviour, lifecycle, distribution, handling and the sources behind all of it.

Reviewed 2026-08-13.

More about this fish

Telling it apart is one question. Here are the others.

Similar and related fish

What these connections rest on (2)

Scientific evidence 2 connections

Supported by peer-reviewed research or fisheries science. The sources are listed and can be checked.

  • Atlantic herring

    Recorded diet evidence identifies Clupea harengus as a food item of this predator at species level. The edge is written at that granularity and no further.

    • FishBase: a global information system on fishes Froese, R. and D. Pauly, eds. — FishBase Consortium (Scientific institute)Relied on for: Food items recorded for this predator, including Clupea harengus.States this directlyPassage read and verified
    • FAO Species Identification Guides for Fishery Purposes and the FAO Species Catalogues Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Scientific institute)Relied on for: Species account describing the diet of this predator in the region where Clupea harengus occurs.Background and mechanism onlyCitation checked — the work exists and is described correctly
  • Burbot

    An identification comparison naming both binomials: Lota lota and Molva molva.

    • FishBase: a global information system on fishes Froese, R. and D. Pauly, eds. — FishBase Consortium (Scientific institute)Relied on for: Morphological and distributional data for Lota lota and for Molva molva.States this directlyPassage read and verified
    • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species International Union for Conservation of Nature (Conservation authority)Relied on for: Separate assessments treating Lota lota and Molva molva as distinct species.States this directlyCitation checked — the work exists and is described correctly

Where it lives

What these connections rest on (1)

Scientific evidence 1 connection

Supported by peer-reviewed research or fisheries science. The sources are listed and can be checked.

  • Inshore ground

    A habitat claim held to a scientific standard.

    • FishBase: a global information system on fishes Froese, R. and D. Pauly, eds. — FishBase Consortium (Scientific institute)Relied on for: That Molva molva is a marine demersal species of the North East Atlantic associated with hard ground, generally between about 100 and 400 m.States this directlyPassage read and verified

Where you will find it

What these connections rest on (1)

Scientific evidence 1 connection

Supported by peer-reviewed research or fisheries science. The sources are listed and can be checked.

  • Shetland

    A distribution association between an animal and a described water body, which is what the `inhabits` predicate is for — the kind of water rather than a named mark.

    • The Fishes of the British Isles and North-West Europe Macmillan, 1969 (Reference work)Relied on for: Distribution, habitat association, depth and ground preference of fishes in British and north-west European waters.States this directlyCitation checked — the work exists and is described correctly
    • FishBase: a global information system on fishes Froese, R. and D. Pauly, eds. — FishBase Consortium (Scientific institute)Relied on for: Distribution, habitat association and depth range recorded for the species.Background and mechanism onlyPassage read and verified
Share this page